Redux vs Redux Toolkit (RTK):
๐ธ Redux (Traditional)
- ๐น Requires manual setup of store, reducers, and middleware.
- ๐น Actions and reducers have a lot of boilerplate code.
- ๐น Uses
combineReducers,createStore, andapplyMiddleware. - ๐น Doesn’t include built-in support for async logic like thunks.
- ๐น Developers often write types, actions, and reducers separately.
๐ธ Redux Toolkit (RTK)
- โ Official, recommended way to use Redux.
- โ
Comes with utilities like:
configureStore()– sets up store with good defaults.createSlice()– automatically creates actions and reducers.createAsyncThunk()– handles async logic.
- โ Reduces boilerplate significantly.
- โ Has Immer.js under the hood → allows mutating state directly.
- โ Better developer experience and fewer chances of mistakes.
- โ Built-in Redux DevTools integration and default middleware.
โ Summary:
| Feature | Redux | Redux Toolkit |
|---|---|---|
| Boilerplate | High | Very Low |
| Async Support | Manual setup needed | Built-in (createAsyncThunk) |
| Setup Complexity | More complex | Simplified (configureStore) |
| Recommended by Redux Team | โ | โ Yes |